The current generation of 25 to 36 years olds, the traditional age group for first-time buyers, are split into 'property haves' and 'property have-nots'. These young adults can expect their current circumstances to have a significant effect on their future property purchases and those of their children, according to a report from HSBC. The headline statements are:
- 'Property haves' have a six year head start on the "have-nots" on the property ladder
- 'Property have-nots' are unlikely to have the same flexibility as 'property haves' to financially support their children in becoming first-time buyers
'Property haves' - those on the housing ladder already - are likely to follow a relatively conventional path through the housing market. The average age of a first-time buyer is currently 29, just one year older than it was 30 years ago. The process of saving up to buy a property took them on average around 2 years and 8 months, 2 months less than they expected. However, two thirds (64%) had help from their parents - via the Bank of Mum and Dad.
'Property have-nots' - within today's 25 to 36 generation, don't expect to buy their first home before the age of 35. In contrast, at 35, 'property haves' will be trading up and moving into their family home. 'Property have-nots' are projected to move into their family home at the age of 42.
Pete Dockar, Head of Mortgages at HSBC, said: "Home ownership continues to be an aspiration for the majority of young people. This study shows postponing their purchase has long term implications not just for their future property ownership, but their ability to help their own children step onto the ladder.
"Deposits remain an essential ingredient to getting a mortgage, but in comparison to previous generations, affordability is still healthy so first time buyers can feel confident about making their first step."
Those aged between 25 and 36 today who own property are likely to pay off their mortgage aged 60. However, 'property have-nots' will still be paying off their mortgage at the age of 67 and a half. This difference in financial flexibility in their sixties is likely to be key to their ability to financially support their own children - creating a cycle where the children of today's 'property haves', go on to become the 'property haves' of tomorrow.